In the Lucy Letby trial, Dr. Dewi Evans, a pivotal prosecution expert witness, has strongly criticized statisticians who have questioned Letby’s guilt.
Dr. Evans, whose reports were crucial in illustrating how babies were harmed and murdered at the Countess of Chester Hospital’s neonatal unit, expressed his shock and frustration over the statisticians’ intervention.
Speaking to the Mail, he described their critiques as both “arrogant” and “ignorant.”
Dr. Evans emphasized that the investigation and trial, which spanned ten months at Manchester Crown Court, had nothing to do with statistical analysis.
He argued that these statisticians lack a comprehensive understanding of medical practices and the legal processes involved.
According to Dr. Evans, the statisticians have not reviewed the critical medical notes or witness statements that played a significant role in the case, nor have they thoroughly examined the Court of Appeal judgment that confirmed the safety of Letby’s convictions.
Experts Call for Inquiry Postponement
Two weeks ago, a collective of 24 experts—including statisticians, scientists, doctors, and neonatologists—petitioned the government to delay the public inquiry into Lucy Letby’s crimes.
They requested that Lady Justice Thirlwall’s inquiry be postponed or its scope revised to address broader professional concerns rather than focusing solely on the criminal aspect of the case.
Tamlin Bolton, a lawyer representing the families of six victims, criticized these requests as deeply distressing for the bereaved families.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today program, Bolton highlighted that any expert opinion should be based on complete information, and she lamented the speculative nature of the arguments presented by these experts.
She stressed that the public inquiry aims to address issues related to hospital governance and patient safety, not to reassess Letby’s already confirmed convictions.
Families’ Reactions and Impact
Dr. Evans condemned the experts’ calls for postponement or alteration of the inquiry’s terms, arguing that such actions would only deepen the anguish of Letby’s victims’ families.
He noted that these families have endured years of grief and have awaited answers about their children’s deaths.
The additional stress caused by these debates, he argued, displays a troubling level of ignorance and arrogance.
Parents of two of Letby’s victims, twins Baby E and Baby F, expressed their hurt and distress over the ongoing questioning of Letby’s convictions.
They criticized the dissemination of misinformation and the out-of-context discussion of evidence, such as the graph showing Letby’s presence during critical incidents.
Baby E was murdered by Letby, while Baby F survived but suffered brain damage.
Future Developments
Lucy Letby, convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven more, remains in prison serving a whole life term after two failed appeal attempts.
Recently, Letby replaced her legal team with renowned miscarriages of justice barrister Mark McDonald, who believes in her innocence.
McDonald plans to apply to the Criminal Cases Review Commission to seek another appeal hearing for Letby.
As the public inquiry is set to commence, the focus will be on examining NHS governance and patient safety, rather than re-evaluating Letby’s criminal convictions.
Mine Crypto. Earn $GOATS while it is free! Click Here!!