Elon Musk Files Major Lawsuit Against Unilever, Mars, CVS Health, and Orsted for Alleged Systematic Boycott of X in Texas Federal Court

Elon Musk, known for his high-profile ventures and occasional controversies, has recently shifted his attention from online spats to a serious legal battle. On August 7, 2024, Musk’s social media platform X, which he acquired in October 2022, filed a significant lawsuit against several major companies.

This move, which has landed in a Texas federal court, is being described as a fight against what X’s CEO Linda Yaccarino has termed a “systematic illegal boycott.”

The lawsuit targets the World Federation of Advertisers and key member companies including Unilever, Mars, CVS Health, and Orsted. According to Yaccarino, these companies have been involved in a coordinated effort to undermine X through a boycott.

This lawsuit follows a period of tension and disagreement between Musk and advertisers, which culminated in Musk’s recent and highly publicized outburst.

Musk’s frustration with advertisers has been evident for some time. In a dramatic outburst at the New York Times DealBook Summit in November 2023, Musk infamously told advertisers to “go f*** yourself” if they tried to use advertising as leverage against him.

His remarks were partly aimed at Bob Iger, CEO of Disney, who had suggested pulling ads from X.

Despite this confrontational stance, Musk also acknowledged that such a boycott could severely harm X’s business prospects.

The Impact of the Boycott

The origins of this legal clash are rooted in an advertiser exodus that began in late 2023. Concerns over X’s content—ranging from extremist views to antisemitic conspiracy theories endorsed by Musk himself—prompted several companies to withdraw their advertising.

Linda Yaccarino pointed to evidence from a US House Judiciary Committee investigation, which she claims revealed a deliberate attempt by certain companies to undermine X’s viability.

Yaccarino’s Accusations

In a video statement, Yaccarino argued that the boycott was not only damaging to X but also detrimental to the broader marketplace of ideas. She contended that the boycott aimed to limit consumer choices and diminish X’s role as a “Global Town Square.”

According to Yaccarino, the alleged illegal actions of these companies have cost X billions of dollars and tarnished the integrity of the advertising industry.

With this lawsuit, Musk and Yaccarino are challenging what they see as a concerted effort to damage X. As this legal battle unfolds, it will be interesting to see how it impacts both the platform and the broader advertising landscape.

Mine Crypto. Earn $GOATS while it is free! Click Here!!

Telegram Airdrops: Crypto Giveaway

Join CryptoFiat Giveaway for free USDT giveaways and other opportunities!